PPLN Λ = 6.82 µm · 1064 → 532 nm · 2 px/µm

1.4 Composition: congruent and stoichiometric

L1 A range, not a formula

48.0–50.0 mol% Li2O; Volk & Wöhlecke 2008

“LiNbO3” is a range, not a formula. The crystal is stable from roughly 47 to 50 mol% Li2O, always on the lithium-poor side of the ideal 50% P-comp. When the melt and the growing crystal have the same composition, the crystal grows uniform from seed to tail. For LiNbO3 that congruent point is about 48.4–48.5 mol% Li2O, a lithium-to-niobium ratio of 0.94 P-comp, so in nearly every commercial crystal about one lithium site in twenty holds no lithium derived.

Removing that deficit changes the crystal: Curie temperature up by about 60 °C, UV absorption edge about 17 nm toward shorter wavelengths derived, the field needed to flip the polarization several-fold lower, and the built-in bias field gone (1.3, 1.8). Stoichiometric crystal cannot be pulled from a stoichiometric melt; it needs one of the growth routes in L2.

Composition dial: c = 48.00–50.00 mol% Li2OP-comp derived
48.45 mol%
preset
defect model
[Li]/[Nb], R10.9399derived
[Li]/([Li]+[Nb]), R20.4845derived
x, per formula unit0.0101derived
NbLi, of Li sites 1.01 %derived
VLi, of Li sites 4.05 %derived
VNb, of Nb sites 0.00 %derived
Tc, Iyi fit1141.5 °CP-comp
Tc, Bordui fit1145.9 °CP-comp
Tm, congruent1255 °CP-comp
λ20 (α = 20 cm−1)320.2 nmderived
λ15 (α = 15 cm−1)321.8 nmderived
Ec at c21 kV/mmP-comp
Eint at c2.2–3.4 kV/mmP-comp
Anchorc spanEcEint
congruent48.38–48.621 kV/mm P-comp2.2–3.4 kV/mm misprint
near-stoich.49.8–50.06.0–6.5 / 2.1–2.5 kV/mm conflict→ 0 P-comp
Tc(c) band, markers= ferroelectric  # between fits  ^ marker
T / °C    1100      1150      1200      1250      1300
          |----+----|----+----|----+----|----+----|
c 48.45   ========##-------------------------------
Tc CLN            ^
Tc nSLN                        ^
Tm CLN                                   ^
UV edge, 22 °C, E ∥ c# α above threshold  . below
λ / nm    300     305     310     315     320     325
          |---+---|---+---|---+---|---+---|---+---|
α>20/cm   ################################|........
α>15/cm   ###################################|.....
Li sites | Nb sites, 32 × 12 eachderived
................................
................... ......#.... 
................................
.#................. ............
.............#...... .......... 
............................. ..
.............. .................
... .#.............. ...........
. ................. ............
.... .......................... 
......... ......................
 ...............................
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
. Li' ' vacancy# NbLi: Nbdrawn of 384: V_Li 15 Nb_Li  4 V_Nb  0
Move c from 48.00 to 50.00 mol%: the Tc band climbs about 60 °C, the UV edge moves about 17 nm to shorter wavelength, and the defect sites empty out. At 48.45 switch the model: the same Li-site holes become Nb antisites and vacancies appear on the Nb sites instead. Ec, Eint: anchors only.
48.45mol% Li2O
[Li]/[Nb]
0.9399
Antisites x per formula unit
0.0101
48.38vendor 48.45Volk & Wöhlecke 2008 48.6Carruthers et al. 1971 50.0stoichiometric
Ec, Eint congruent near-stoichiometric

Lattice sites

derived
Li sites 1.01 % NbLi ·  4.05 % VLi
Nb sites 0.00 % VNb
LiNbNbLivacancydrawn of 360 each: 14 Li vacancies,  4 antisites,  0 Nb vacancies

Curie temperature

P-comp
Tc, Iyi / Bordui fit
1141.5 °C / 1145.9 °C
Markers
P-comp

Stripes: the ferroelectric phase, where ±z domains exist; it ends at Tc. Waves: congruent crystal is molten above 1255 °C.

UV absorption edge

derived
λ20 / λ15
320.2 nm / 321.8 nm

22 °C, E ∥ c, k ⊥ c. Hatched: ultraviolet (below 400 nm), invisible. Shaded: absorption above 20 cm−1. Solid line λ20, dashed λ15.

Switching fields

congruent
Congruent, 48.38–48.6 mol%
Ec
21 kV/mm P-comp
Eint
2.2–3.4 kV/mm misprint
Near-stoichiometric, from 49.8 mol%
Ec
6.0–6.5 or 2.1–2.5 kV/mm conflict
Eint
→ 0 P-comp

Values light only while c sits in an anchor span; between them no source gives a value. P-comp

L2 Composition data

congruent point, ratios, UV edge, growth routes
QuantityValueStatus
Phase diagram Li2O–Nb2O5Reisman and Holtzberg 1958P
Congruent composition48.45 mol% Li2O, [Li]/[Nb] = 0.94P-comp
Congruent composition48.6 mol% Li2O; room-temperature solid solution 48–50 mol%P(abs)
Congruent compositionLi/Nb mole ratio 0.946P
Congruent compositionC = Li2O/(Li2O + Nb2O5) = 0.484P(abs)
Congruent composition48.38 ± 0.01 mol%; reference point of the UV-edge formulaV P-comp
Solid-solution widthabout 6 mol% above 1150 °C; diffuse liquidus maximum at about 48.45 mol%P-comp
Required uniformity for optics[Li]/[Nb] fixed within 10−3P-comp
Melt to crystalc = 48.5 + 0.3436 (cmelt − 48.5) − 0.02897 (cmelt − 48.5)2, valid 45 < cmelt < 52 mol%, ±0.3 mol%P-comp

Ratios

Composition ratios in the literature: R1 = [Li]/[Nb], R2 = [Li]/([Li] + [Nb]) = c/100 derived. At c = 48.45 mol%, R1 = 0.940 derived. Volk & Wöhlecke 2008 prints R1 = 0.969 next to R2 = 0.4845 on p. 5, inconsistent with its own 0.94 on p. 10 misprint.

UV absorption edge vs composition

22 °C, E ∥ c, k ⊥ c, x = c − 48.38 mol% P-comp:

λ20 = 320.4 − 1.829 x − 5.485 x2   nm   (absorption 20 cm−1)
λ15 = 321.9 − 1.597 x − 5.745 x2   nm   (absorption 15 cm−1)
c (mol% Li2O)λ20λ15Status
48.38320.4 nm321.9 nmderived
49.00317.2 nm318.7 nmderived
49.50311.5 nm312.9 nmderived
50.00303.0 nm304.2 nmderived

Above 49.5 mol%, 0.1 mol% maps to about 2 nm P-comp.

Growth routes to near-stoichiometric LiNbO3 (all reported 1992–1997)

MethodPrincipleReported parametersStatus
Vapor transport equilibration (VTE)crystal plate and Li-rich powder in one Pt crucible, no contact; Li diffuses in> 1000 °C for days; plates < 1 mm, up to 3 mm reported; “extremely slow lithium diffusivity” for Li-poor targetsP-comp P(abs)
Double-crucible Czochralski (DCCZ)pull from an Li-rich inner melt (about 58–60 mol% Li2O) in equilibrium with near-stoichiometric solid; stoichiometric powder fed continuously to the outer crucible, weight-controlled–P-comp P
Growth from K2O-containing meltmelt with up to 10% K2O; negligible K in the crystalcompositions 49.95 mol% or moreP-comp P
Top-seeded solution growth (TSSG)same chemistry treated as a high-temperature solutionboules 20 mm diameterP-comp P

L3 How it is measured

chemical, thermal, optical; why the congruent values differ

Methods. Non-optical: chemical analysis, Tc, density, NMR and EPR linewidths, diffraction. Optical: UV edge, OH-band shape, Raman linewidths, phase-matching temperature; optical methods reach 0.1 mol% absolute and about 0.01 mol% relative accuracy P-comp P(abs). The UV-edge method needs a reflection correction of about 1 nm and fails when an impurity such as Fe absorbs near the edge P-comp. For near-stoichiometric crystal the intensity ratio of the OH components at 3480 and 3465 cm−1 decreases linearly with Li2O from 49.7 to 50 mol% P-comp.

Why 48.38 vs 48.45 vs 48.6. The congruent point depends on how the melt composition was determined, and on the oxygen content of the Nb2O5 feedstock, which may be oxygen-deficient P-comp. The L2 table gives each value with its source.

Defect models in the dial. The Li-site vacancy model compensates each NbLi with four Li vacancies; the Nb-site vacancy model compensates five NbLi with four Nb vacancies. Both predict the same R1 at every c, so composition alone cannot decide between them P-comp; the evidence is in 1.5. The dial's anchors for Ec and Eint come from 1.8.

Sources

13 cited in 1.4
  1. Volk & Wöhlecke 2008T. Volk, M. Woehlecke, Lithium Niobate: Defects, Photorefraction and Ferroelectric Switching, Springer Series in Materials Science 115 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70766-0
  2. Iyi et al. 1992N. Iyi, K. Kitamura, F. Izumi, J. K. Yamamoto, T. Hayashi, H. Asano, S. Kimura, "Comparative study of defect structures in lithium niobate with different compositions", J. Solid State Chem. 101, 340-352 (1992). doi:10.1016/0022-4596(92)90189-3
  3. Bordui et al. 1992P. F. Bordui, R. G. Norwood, D. H. Jundt, M. M. Fejer, "Preparation and characterization of off-congruent lithium niobate crystals", J. Appl. Phys. 71, 875-879 (1992). doi:10.1063/1.351308
  4. Gopalan et al. 1998V. Gopalan, T. E. Mitchell, Y. Furukawa, K. Kitamura, "The role of nonstoichiometry in 180 ° domain switching of LiNbO3 crystals", Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1981-1983 (1998). doi:10.1063/1.121491
  5. Chen et al. 2001Y.-L. Chen, J.-J. Xu, X.-J. Chen, Y.-F. Kong, G.-Y. Zhang, "Domain reversion process in near-stoichiometric LiNbO3 crystals", Opt. Commun. 188, 359-364 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0030-4018(00)01137-8
  6. Crystal Technology 1999Crystal Technology Inc., "LiNbO3 material properties", data sheet DC-12 8/99 (congruent, 48.38 mol% Li2O).
  7. Carruthers et al. 1971J. R. Carruthers, G. E. Peterson, M. Grasso, P. M. Bridenbaugh, "Nonstoichiometry and crystal growth of lithium niobate", J. Appl. Phys. 42, 1846-1851 (1971). doi:10.1063/1.1660455
  8. Reisman & Holtzberg 1958A. Reisman, F. Holtzberg, "Heterogeneous equilibria in the systems Li2O-, Ag2O-Nb2O5 and oxide-models", J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 6503-6507 (1958). doi:10.1021/ja01557a010
  9. Weis & Gaylord 1985R. S. Weis, T. K. Gaylord, "Lithium niobate: Summary of physical properties and crystal structure", Appl. Phys. A 37, 191-203 (1985). doi:10.1007/BF00614817
  10. Kovacs et al. 1997L. Kovacs, G. Ruschhaupt, K. Polgar, G. Corradi, M. Woehlecke, "Composition dependence of the ultraviolet absorption edge in lithium niobate", Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2801-2803 (1997). doi:10.1063/1.119056
  11. Kitamura et al. 1992K. Kitamura, J. K. Yamamoto, N. Iyi, S. Kimura, T. Hayashi, "Stoichiometric LiNbO3 single crystal growth by double crucible Czochralski method using automatic powder supply system", J. Cryst. Growth 116, 327-332 (1992). doi:10.1016/0022-0248(92)90640-5
  12. Malovichko et al. 1993G. I. Malovichko, V. G. Grachev, E. P. Kokanyan, O. F. Schirmer, K. Betzler, B. Gather, F. Jermann, S. Klauer, U. Schlarb, M. Woehlecke, "Characterization of stoichiometric LiNbO3 grown from melts containing K2O", Appl. Phys. A 56, 103-108 (1993). doi:10.1007/BF00517674
  13. Polgar et al. 1997K. Polgar, A. Peter, L. Kovacs, G. Corradi, Zs. Szaller, "Growth of stoichiometric LiNbO3 single crystals by top seeded solution growth method", J. Cryst. Growth 177, 211-216 (1997). doi:10.1016/S0022-0248(96)01098-6