PPLN Λ = 18.99 µm · 1550 → 775 nm · 2 px/µm

2.1 Birefringence and the index ellipsoid

L1 Phenomenon

z-cut plate between crossed polarizers

LiNbO3 is optically uniaxial and negative: light polarized along the c axis sees the extraordinary index ne, light polarized perpendicular to it sees the ordinary index no, and ne < no. At 1550 nm, no = 2.2111 and ne = 2.1376, a birefringence of −0.07355 P-db derived.

Between crossed polarizers in a cone of convergent light (conoscopy), a z-cut plate shows a dark cross (isogyres) and concentric dark rings (isochromes). For a 1.00 mm plate at 632.8 nm the first three dark rings sit at 11.1, 15.7 and 19.4° from the axis, in air derived. A field across the plate, along x or y, makes the crystal biaxial through r22: the single optic axis splits in two and the cross opens into two hyperbolic brushes around the melatopes.

Conoscope: z-cut LN, P ∥ x, A ∥ y, NA 0.55632.8 nm, gray
0.00 kV/mm
1.00 mm
E along
Source
632.8 nm
r set
Δn induced along z, at λ0.000e+00
retardance along z 0.000 rad
optic-axis tilt in air, exact  0.00°
first order, r22 only  0.00°
stateuniaxial
in-plane slow axis from x    –°
ring 1 at E = 0, at λ11.09°
S Kaminow 1980: r22 3.4 pm/V, r51 18.2 pm/VP-compreticle: 5° in air; ticks below the axis: exact dark-ring angles at E = 0 and λ; +: computed optic axes; the source slider selects a monochromatic wavelength (white light: luminance)indices P-dbnumbers derived
c PEA LampwhitePolarizerP along xCondenserNA 0.55LN platez-cut, 1.00 mmObjectiveAnalyzerA along yBertrand lens

Lamp

632.8 nm

LN plate

1.00 mm

Electrodes

0.00 kV/mm
Pockels coefficients
0NA 0.55 edge
Δn induced, at λ
0.000e+00
Optic axes, tilt in air
  0.00°
First order, r22 only
  0.00°
In-plane slow axis from x
    –°
Retardance along z
 0.000 rad
State
uniaxial
First dark ring, E = 0, at λ
11.09°
Retardation at the NA edge
 
Indices P-dbS Kaminow 1980: r22 3.4 pm/V, r51 18.2 pm/VP-compeyepiece frame: 3m mirror-plane tracesExact plane-wave retardance; tilt derived

L2 Quantitative model

index ellipsoid, dispersion, thermo-optics

Index ellipsoid

With no field, in the crystal frame (IEEE Std 176-1987, z = c) P, the index ellipsoid is

x2no2+y2no2+z2ne2=1(2.1)

A wave whose wave vector makes the angle θ with c has one ordinary index no and one extraordinary index

1ne(θ)2=cos2θno2+sin2θne2(2.2)

The extraordinary Poynting vector walks off the wave vector by ρ, tan ρ = (ne(θ)2/2)(1/ne2 − 1/no2) sin 2θ. Largest walk-off: 2.150° at θ = 43.92° (632.8 nm), 2.000° at 44.00° (1064 nm), 1.938° at 44.03° (1550 nm) derived.

Index ellipsoid, E = 0: section normal to k, ne(θ), ρZelmon 1997 CLN, 21 °C
                                c                               
                                |                               
                                |                               
                                |                 k             
                                |              ***              
                                |             **                
                                |           **                  
                    --·····;;;;;;;;:::::,,**          ++ S      
                  =|·=====·····;;;;:::::***,,.    ++++          
                ===|========;;····;:::***,,,,.++++              
              =====||======;;;;;;···***:,,++++...y              
           --=======\\====;;;;;;;:***·++++,,.......             
             ========\\==;;;;;;;:*++++··,,.........             
            ;=========\\\;;;;;::++::,,,···..........            
             ;;;;;;;;;;;\\·::::::,,,,,...··........             
             :;;;;;-;;;:::\\·:,,,,,.......··...------           
              ,----::::::,,,\\·,...........··.....    x         
                ,,,,,,,,,,,...\\\·..........·...                
                  ...............\\\··.....··.                  
                      ...............-------                    
                                |                               
                                |                               
                                |                               
                                |                               
                                |                               
                                |                               
                                                                
* k+ S (drawn walk-off)- / | \ section ellipse; · hidden
40.0°
 30°
1550 nm
no (ordinary wave)2.21111
ne(θ) (extraordinary wave)2.17981
ne(θ) − no−0.03130
walk-off ρ1.919°
largest ρ at this λ1.938° at 44.03°
01530456075900.00.51.01.52.02.5θ from c (deg)ρ (deg)2.13762.2111n(θ)
ρ(θ)ne(θ), right scaledotted: θ of largest ρ
Drawing exaggerated, numbers exact derivedindices P-db
40.0°
 30°
1550 nm
Ordinary index
2.21111
Extraordinary index ne(θ)
2.17981
ne(θ) − no
−0.03130
Walk-off of S from k
1.919°
Largest walk-off
1.938° at 44.03°

Drawn: semi-axes 1 + 10 (ni/n̄ − 1); S is the normal of the drawn surface. k in the color of the chosen wavelength (infrared: false color, dashed). derived

Dispersion

Zelmon et al. fitted congruent LN (CLN) at 21 °C over 0.4 to 5.0 µm with a three-term Sellmeier equation P-db:

n2−1=∑i=13Biλ2λ2−Ci,λ in µm, Ci in µm2(2.3)
AxisB1C1B2C2B3C3Status
o2.67340.017641.22900.0591412.614474.60P-db
e2.98040.020470.59810.06668.9543416.08P-db

Coefficients transcribed from the paper by refractiveindex.info (CC0) P-db; the paper itself is not held.

Computed indices, 21 °C derived

λ (µm)nonene − nong,ong,e
0.4002.439272.33212−0.107153.06232.8619
0.5322.323192.23357−0.089622.58472.4562
0.63282.286462.20222−0.084242.45682.3480
0.7752.258662.17837−0.080292.36862.2728
1.0642.232112.15554−0.076572.29692.2113
1.3102.219972.14512−0.074852.27382.1912
1.5502.211112.13756−0.073552.26372.1823
2.0002.196702.12533−0.071362.25992.1787
3.3902.144732.08158−0.063152.29922.2115
5.0002.050802.00253−0.048272.41422.3087

The birefringence shrinks by a factor 2.2 from 0.4 to 5 µm. The group index has its minimum where material group-velocity dispersion (GVD) changes sign: 1.913 µm (e) and 1.899 µm (o) derived.

Check against measurement: Nelson and Mikulyak measured no = 2.2866, ne = 2.2028 at 632.8 nm and 24.5 °C, and 2.2323, 2.1561 at 1060 nm P-comp. Zelmon gives 2.2865, 2.2022 at 632.8 nm: no differs by −0.0001, ne by −0.0006.

Index, group index, birefringence and dn/dT vs wavelengthnₑ < nₒ: negative uniaxial     
0.40.612352.02.12.22.32.4λ (µm)n
1550 nm
 21 °C
Quantity
Crystal
MgO5 table
λ axis
Zelmon 1997oP-db  2.21111 
Zelmon 1997eP-db  2.13756 
Jundt 1997eS  2.13773 
            
largest spread between models of one axis at the cursor1.7e−04
bars above the plot: validity window of each model (hatched: outside)• ○ Nelson and Mikulyak, 24.5 °C P-compZelmon P-dbJundt SGayer Perratum reportedmodels evaluated derived
0.40.612352.02.12.22.32.4λ (µm)n10641550
1550 nm
 21 °C
Quantity
Crystal
Zelmon 5% MgO table
Zelmon 1997, o
  2.21111
Zelmon 1997, e
  2.13756
Jundt 1997, e
  2.13773
 
         
Model spread, one axis
1.7e−04

nₑ < nₒ: negative uniaxial     

Bars above the plot: validity window of each model (hatched outside). Filled and open dots: Nelson and Mikulyak, 24.5 °C, no and ne P-comp. Zelmon is defined at 21 °C only.

Zelmon P-dbJundt SGayer PErratum reportedInfrared in false color

Models and errata

ModelMaterialAxesT rangeStatusErratum or caveat
Zelmon 1997CLNo, e21 °C onlyP-dbnone for CLN
Zelmon 19975 mol% MgO:CLNo, e21 °C onlyP-dbTable 2 o/e headings switched; erratum published 2026-10-22 reported; the swap was stated in print in 2008 P. Coefficients copied from the 1997 table give ne > no, impossible for negative uniaxial LN
Jundt 1997CLNe only20 to 250 °CSprimary not held; f = (T − 24.5)(T + 570.82) as transcribed
Gayer 20085 mol% MgO:CLN, 1% MgO:SLNe (both); o (MgO5)ne 20 to 200 °C; no to 1620 nm, about 20 to 100 °CPerratum replaces Fig. 3 only, Table 1 unchanged P; dn/dT from its b coefficients is anomalous (below)
Schlarb, generalizedCLN to SLN, Mg, Zn, Ino, e400 to 1200 nmSaccuracy about 2×10−3; 1993-1996 primaries not held
Edwards and Lawrence 1984CLNo, eT-dependent[Edwards 1984]coefficients not entered

At 1550 nm: Jundt ne = 2.13786 at 24.5 °C vs Zelmon 2.13756 at 21 °C derived. Gayer 5 mol% MgO: ne = 2.13057, no = 2.20881 at 24.5 °C derived. Composition moves ne far more than no: near-stoichiometric LN (SLN) has no = 2.288, ne = 2.190 at 633 nm P-comp, so ne drops by 0.012 relative to CLN while no changes by +1.5×10−3; the generalized Sellmeier gives 2.2859 and 2.1867 at 50.0 mol% Li2O S.

Thermo-optic coefficients

QuantityValue (1/K)ConditionStatus
dne/dT4.89×10−5 / 4.01×10−5 / 3.75×10−5CLN, 632.8 / 1064 / 1550 nm, 25 °C, JundtS derived
dne/dT4.12×10−5CLN, 632 nm, 300 K, fit (−2.6 + 22.4×10−3 T)×10−5S derived
dno/dT3.70×10−6CLN, 632 nm, 300 K, fit (−1.7 + 6.9×10−3 T)×10−5S derived
dne/dT3.34×10−5CLN, 1523 nm, 300 KS
dn/dT from Gayer b coefficients2.65×10−4 (MgO5 e), 1.11×10−4 (MgO5 o), −7.08×10−5 (1% MgO:SLN e)1550 nm, 24.5 °C; not physical, not for absolute dn/dTderived

ne is about ten times more temperature-sensitive than no, so heating a plate changes its birefringence almost entirely through ne. Moretti's measured range is 320 to 515 K in the abstract and 300 to 515 K in the title reported.

L3 Computation and measurement

conoscope, field-induced biaxiality, Sellmeier evaluation, error budget

Conoscope

Each pixel is one propagation direction (u, v) = sin θair (cos φ, sin φ). Each eigenwave is refracted with its own index (the extraordinary angle by fixed-point iteration of eq. 2.2), so the retardation Γ = (2πd/λ)(nslow cos θslow − nfast cos θfast) is exact for plane waves. Between crossed polarizers I = sin2(2ψ) sin2(Γ/2), ψ the azimuth of the eigen-polarization relative to the polarizer: dark rings at Γ = 2πm, isogyres where ψ = 0 or 90°. Fresnel transmission differences between the eigenwaves are neglected. White light: I(λ) summed over eleven Gaussian-weighted samples from 420 to 680 nm [Born & Wolf]. The ring angles in L1 come from the exact phase, not the small-angle formula.

Field-induced biaxiality

For E along x or y on a z-cut plate, the in-plane impermeability splits by r22E, so the birefringence for propagation along z is no3r22E. At 632.8 nm, E = 1 kV/mm and r22 = 3.4 pm/V (clamped; Turner 1966 and Kaminow et al. 1980 agree P-comp), this is 4.064×10−5, a retardation of 0.404 rad for d = 1 mm derived. To first order the optic axes tilt from c by θ with (no − ne) sin2θ = no3r22E: 1.26° inside, 2.88° in air. The exact eigen-decomposition with the full tensor gives 1.27° / 2.91° for E along x and 1.22° / 2.80° for E along y (Kaminow set, r51 = 18.2 pm/V); the Turner set (r51 = 28 pm/V) gives 1.30° / 2.98° for E along x derived. The difference between x and y comes from r51, which the first-order formula omits; it reaches about 3%. A static field on an unclamped plate sees the free coefficients (Zook et al.: r22 = 6.81 pm/V P-comp), which roughly double the effect.

Evaluating Sellmeier models

Inputs are vacuum wavelength in µm and temperature in °C; every model refuses input outside its stated window. Tests: ne < no over the whole window (catches the 5 mol% MgO swap); Zelmon CLN at 1.55 µm: no = 2.21111, ne = 2.13756. Group index and GVD from analytic derivatives of n2(λ).

Error budget at 1550 nm derived

Zelmon (21 °C) and Jundt (24.5 °C) differ by 3.0×10−4 in ne; 3.5 K × dne/dT gives 1.3×10−4 of that, the remaining 1.7×10−4 is model-to-model spread. This spread moves the first-order SHG QPM period at 1550 nm by 13 nm (18.989 vs 18.976 µm). Composition and doping dominate every other uncertainty for ne (0.012 between CLN and SLN at 633 nm); indices here are for CLN unless another variant (SLN, 5 mol% MgO:CLN, 1% MgO:SLN) is named.

Primary-data caveats

Weis & Gaylord Table 2 misprints no at 472.7 nm as 3.3597; the neighbouring rows give 2.3597 P. Machine ingestion of that table needs the fix. The Zelmon and Jundt papers are not held: their coefficients are database (P-db) and secondary (S) transcriptions.

References

15 sources cited in this section
Born & Wolf 2019Principles of Optics. (2019).doi:10.1017/9781108769914
Edwards & Lawrence 1984A temperature-dependent dispersion equation for congruently grown lithium niobate. Optical and Quantum Electronics 16 373-375 (1984).doi:10.1007/bf00620081
Gayer et al. 2008Temperature and wavelength dependent refractive index equations for MgO-doped congruent and stoichiometric LiNbO3. Applied Physics B 91 343-348 (2008).doi:10.1007/s00340-008-2998-2
Gayer et al. 2008Temperature and wavelength dependent refractive index equations for MgO-doped congruent and stoichiometric LiNbO3. Applied Physics B 94 367-367 (2008).doi:10.1007/s00340-008-3316-8
IEEE 1988IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity (IEEE Std 176-1987). (1988).doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.1988.79638
J. R. M.-L. Schwesyg 2011Interaction of light with impurities in lithium niobate crystals. Dr. rer. nat. dissertation, Universitat Bonn (2011).no DOI
Jundt 1997Temperature-dependent Sellmeier equation for the index of refraction, n_e, in congruent lithium niobate. Optics Letters 22 1553 (1997).doi:10.1364/OL.22.001553
Moretti et al. 2005Temperature dependence of the thermo-optic coefficient of lithium niobate, from 300 to 515 K in the visible and infrared regions. Journal of Applied Physics 98 036101 (2005).doi:10.1063/1.1988987
Nelson & Mikulyak 1974Refractive indices of congruently melting lithium niobate. Journal of Applied Physics 45 3688-3689 (1974).doi:10.1063/1.1663839
Polyanskiy 2024Refractiveindex.info database of optical constants. Scientific Data 11 94 (2024).doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02898-2
Volk & Wöhlecke 2009Lithium Niobate. Springer Series in Materials Science (2009).doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70766-0
Weis & Gaylord 1985Lithium niobate: Summary of physical properties and crystal structure. Applied Physics A Solids and Surfaces 37 191-203 (1985).doi:10.1007/BF00614817
Zelmon et al. 1997Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol% magnesium oxide –doped lithium niobate. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 14 3319 (1997).doi:10.1364/JOSAB.14.003319
Zelmon et al. 2026Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol. % magnesium oxide–doped lithium niobate: erratum. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 43 2788 (2026).doi:10.1364/JOSAB.616304
Zhu et al. 2021Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate. Advances in Optics and Photonics 13 242 (2021).doi:10.1364/AOP.411024