PPLN Λ = 6.82 µm · 1064 → 532 nm · 2 px/µm

3.2 Elastic constants and bulk waves

L1 Phenomenon

bulk sound speeds; Kushibiki et al. 1999 constants

Sound in LN travels at 3.5 to 7.4 km/s depending on direction and polarization (3474 to 7357 m/s over all directions derived): 7.33 km/s for a compression wave along the polar axis, 3.59 km/s for a shear wave along the same axis (Kushibiki et al. 1999 Table II P). Because the crystal is piezoelectric, an acoustic wave carries an electric field with it, and that field makes the crystal stiffer for that wave: the compression wave along Z is 3.2% faster than it would be in a non-piezoelectric crystal with the same elastic constants (7328.6 vs 7102.1 m/s derived).

Switch the stiffening off and on: the Z-longitudinal velocity moves between 7102 and 7329 m/s and lands on the measured value, while the Y-propagating shear wave polarized along X does not move at all.

Slowness 1/v (s/km) in a crystal plane, Kushibiki et al. 1999

solid: stiffened; dashed: e = 0; +: measured (Table II)

0.10.20.3YZZ longitudinal: 7328.20 m/sZ shear: 3590.41 m/sY longitudinal: 6806.55 m/sY shear: 3940.49 m/s

probe direction n

v quasi-L, fast, slow
7328.6 3590.4 3590.4
selected v
7328.6 m/s
Δv piezo (stiff − bare)
+226.5 m/s
power-flow angle
 00.0°
polarization u
 0.000  0.000 +1.000
n
 0.000  0.000 +1.000
Mode
Readouts
090.0°
Kushibiki et al. 1999 cE, e, εS, ρ P Christoffel with stiffening derived measured: Table II P frame IEEE-176-1987
quasi-longitudinal, no stiffeningstiffened by 230 m/sshear sheets

Along the probe: quasi-L

7328.6m/s
piezo stiffening Δv
+226.5 m/s
power-flow angle
 00.0°
polarization
 0.000  0.000 +1.000

Against Kushibiki et al. 1999 Table II

Z longitudinal, measured 7328.20
7328.55
Y shear along X, measured 3940.49
3940.60
Constants
Probe plane
090.0°
Mode
View
Kushibiki et al. 1999 constants and Table II PChristoffel with stiffening derivedframe IEEE-176-1987sheet radius = slowness 1/v, 0.30 s/km at the box edge

Bulk velocities, computed vs measured (m/s)

DirectionModeMeasuredComputed, stiffenedComputed, e = 0
Zlongitudinal7328.20 ± 0.32 P7328.55 derived7102.07
Zshear (degenerate)3590.41 ± 0.23 P3590.39 derived3590.39
Xlongitudinal6544.53 ± 0.30 P6544.61 derived6544.61
Yquasi-longitudinal6806.55 ± 0.26 P6806.82 derived6551.84
Yshear, polarized along X3940.49 ± 0.21 P3940.60 derived3577.18
Xfast shear (resonance method)4750.67 ± 0.59 P4750.09 derived4043.57

L2 Elastic constants and the Christoffel equation

3m: six independent cE

Elastic stiffness at constant E, 3m form: c22 = c11, c23 = c13, c24 = −c14, c55 = c44, c56 = c14, c66 = (c11 − c12)/2; six independent constants (Weis & Gaylord 1985 Eq. 17 P).

Source (GPa)c11c12c13c14c33c44c66Status
Kushibiki et al. 1999198.86 ± 0.0354.67 ± 0.0467.99 ± 0.557.83 ± 0.02234.18 ± 0.7559.85 ± 0.0172.09 ± 0.02P
Ogi et al. 2002, 30 °C199.5 ± 0.255.27 ± 0.1367.67 ± 0.268.7 ± 0.2235.2 ± 0.459.48 ± 0.0472.10 ± 0.01P
Smith and Welsh 1971203.057.375.28.5242.459.5–P-comp
Warner et al. 19672035375924560–P-comp

Density: 4642.8 ± 0.2 kg/m³ (Kushibiki et al. 1999 Table IV P); 4636 (Ogi et al. 2002 P); 4647 CLN, 4635 near-SLN (Volk & Wöhlecke 2008 Table 1.1 P-comp). Temperature coefficients of cE (Smith and Welsh): c11 −1.74, c12 −2.52, c13 −1.59, c14 −2.14, c33 −1.53, c44 −2.04 × 10−4/K (Weis & Gaylord 1985 Table 6 P-comp). LiTaO3 for comparison: c14 = −10.75 GPa, opposite in sign to LN in the same convention (Kushibiki et al. 1999 P); the other LiTaO3 constants are not available here.

Christoffel equation with piezoelectric stiffening, for a plane wave with unit wave normal n (IEEE 176 Eqs. 46-50 P):

Γjk=cijklEninl+(emijnmni)(enklnnnl)εrsSnrns,det(Γjk−ρv2δjk)=0(1)

Three velocities with orthogonal polarizations per direction; their inverses over all directions form the slowness surface. The second term is the stiffening: the wave's longitudinal electric field (quasistatic, curl-free) adds stiffness proportional to the square of the effective piezoelectric constant. The velocity table in L1 compares the computed velocities with the measured ones; the agreement (< 0.6 m/s) is a consistency check, not an independent test, since Kushibiki et al. 1999 fitted its constants to these velocities. Along X the remaining shear branch is 4028.96 m/s derived. Along Y the X-polarized shear is purely elastic (unstiffened) and the other two waves are stiffened and couple longitudinal and transverse motion, as IEEE 176 Eq. 53 states for class 3m P.

L3 Computation and error sources

solver, rotation, consistency

Solver. Γ is real symmetric; a 3×3 Jacobi eigen-decomposition per direction gives velocities and polarizations. Group velocity and power-flow angle follow from the gradient of ρv2 = u·Γ(n)·u with respect to n (Hellmann-Feynman; Γ is homogeneous of degree 2 in n, so vg = ∇n(uΓu)/(2ρv)); Jaeken & Cottenier 2016 is the algorithm reference S. At degenerate directions (shear along Z) the group velocity depends on the eigenvector picked and is not unique.

Rotation. Rotate full-rank tensors (cijkl, eijk, εij) with aip; the Bond 6×6 matrices (Bond 1943) are equivalent and convenient for Voigt storage. IEEE 176 warns that compressed notation hides transformation properties (p. 8, after Table 2 P).

Unstiffened vs stiffened. Setting e = 0 gives the unstiffened velocities; stiffening vanishes for directions where emijnmni = 0.

c66 consistency. Kushibiki et al. 1999 lists c66 = 72.09 while (c11 − c12)/2 = 72.095; computations enforce the symmetry relation.

Composition. Elastic and photoelastic properties change little with MgO doping (Andrushchak et al. 2009, abstract S). The dependence of SAW velocity on Li2O content is not quantified in the sources held.

References

3.2
SourceReferenceLink
Kushibiki et al. 1999Kushibiki et al., IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 46 1315-1323 (1999). Accurate measurements of the acoustical physical constants of LiNbO3 and LiTaO3 single crystalsdoi:10.1109/58.796136
Ogi et al. 2002Ogi et al., Journal of Applied Physics 92 2451-2456 (2002). Acoustic spectroscopy of lithium niobate: Elastic and piezoelectric coefficientsdoi:10.1063/1.1497702
Weis & Gaylord 1985Weis & Gaylord, Applied Physics A Solids and Surfaces 37 191-203 (1985). Lithium niobate: Summary of physical properties and crystal structuredoi:10.1007/BF00614817
Smith & Welsh 1971Smith & Welsh, Journal of Applied Physics 42 2219-2230 (1971). Temperature Dependence of the Elastic, Piezoelectric, and Dielectric Constants of Lithium Tantalate and Lithium Niobatedoi:10.1063/1.1660528
Warner et al. 1967Warner, Onoe & Coquin, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 42 1223-1231 (1967). Determination of Elastic and Piezoelectric Constants for Crystals in Class (3m)doi:10.1121/1.1910709
Volk & Wohlecke 2009Volk & Wohlecke, Springer Series in Materials Science (2009). Lithium Niobate: Defects, Photorefraction and Ferroelectric Switchingdoi:10.1007/978-3-540-70766-0
IEEE 1988IEEE, IEEE (1988). IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity (IEEE Std 176-1987)doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.1988.79638
Jaeken & Cottenier 2016Jaeken & Cottenier, Computer Physics Communications 207 445-451 (2016). Solving the Christoffel equation: Phase and group velocitiesdoi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.06.014
Bond 1943Bond, Bell System Technical Journal 22 1-72 (1943). The Mathematics of the Physical Properties of Crystalsdoi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1943.tb01304.x
Andrushchak et al. 2009Andrushchak et al., Journal of Applied Physics 106 073510 (2009). Complete sets of elastic constants and photoelastic coefficients of pure and MgO-doped lithium niobate crystals at room temperaturedoi:10.1063/1.3238507