PPLN Λ = 6.82 µm · 1064 → 532 nm · 2 px/µm

3.4 Cuts and coupling

L1 Phenomenon

rotated Y cuts; Kushibiki et al. 1999 constants

Rotate the cutting plane of an LN boule and the surface wave changes speed and strength. At a cut rotated about 128° from the Y axis, the ordinary surface wave is close to its strongest coupling (5.4%) and the competing fast wave has no isolated solution derived; 128° rotated Y wafers are the LN SAW product of crystal suppliers (Sumitomo Metal Mining P). Near 41 and 64° the fast, leaky wave dominates instead, with two to three times the coupling.

Slide through 128°: the Rayleigh coupling peaks (5.42% at 129°) where the leaky branch has faded out; near 60 to 70° the reverse happens, the Rayleigh coupling falls to about zero while the leaky wave carries 9 to 11%. The industrial cuts sit where one wave is strong and the other absent.

Rotated Y-X cuts, (YXl) θ, propagation along X

(a) phase velocity, m/s. Solid: free surface; dashed: metallized. Bold: Rayleigh; thin: leaky SAW; ◇ vendor

340036003800400042004400460048000°30°60°90°120°150°180°slow shear 4029.0fast shear 4750.141°64°128°vendor (Fomos-Materials, V): 3980 m/s at 128°vendor (Fomos-Materials, V): 4690 m/s at 64°vendor (Fomos-Materials, V): 4750 m/s at 41°

(b) k² = 2(vfree − vmet)/vfree, %. Dots: one surface threshold-pinned (indicative)

051015200°30°60°90°120°150°180°
Show
k² axis
θ = 128.0°vfree m/svmet m/sk² %loss free dB/λloss met dB/λ
Rayleigh3978.43870.7 5.4100
leaky SAW ---.- ---.----.-- ------ ------
no isolated leaky root. Leaky gaps (not isolated), free: 26.5, 27.5, 66-66.5, 123-135, 142-147°; metallized: 118-154.5°.
partial-wave solver, sweep at 0.5° derived constants: Kushibiki et al. 1999 POgi et al. 2002 c, e, ρ with Kushibiki et al. 1999 εS PWarner c (P-comp), e (S), εS 44.3/27.9, ρ 4700 assumed P-comp vendor markers V

Drag the cutting plane around X (X points out of the page)

YZ (c)Y′41°64°128°
wafer, edge-onplate normal Y′ = Y cos θ + Z sin θ

(YXl) 128.0°: which wave couples

Rayleigh  5.41%leaky SAW no root
Rayleigh v free / metallized
3978.4 / 3870.7 m/s
leaky v free / metallized
---.- / ---.- m/s
leaky loss free / metallized
------ / ------ dB/λ
leaky k²
---.-- %

k² vs θ: Rayleigh (green), leaky (gold); dots: one surface threshold-pinned (indicative)

0%5%10%15%20%0°45°90°135°180°

no isolated leaky root. Leaky gaps (not isolated), free: 26.5, 27.5, 66-66.5, 123-135, 142-147°; metallized: 118-154.5°.

128.0°
Constants
partial-wave solver, 0.5° sweep derivedconstants Kushibiki et al. 1999 Pconstants Ogi et al. 2002 (εS Kushibiki et al. 1999) Pconstants Warner 1967, ρ 4700 assumed P-comporbit and arrow size ∝ √k²

L2 Cut notation and the rotated Y-X sweep

IEEE 176 Sec. 3.6; Kushibiki et al. 1999 constants

Cut notation (IEEE 176 Sec. 3.6 P): a singly rotated plate (YXl) θ starts as a Y-cut plate with length along X and is rotated by θ about its length (X). “128° Y-X” = (YXl) 128°, wave propagating along X. Plate normal Y′ = Y cos θ + Z sin θ. The bulk thresholds along X do not depend on θ: slow shear 4028.96 m/s, fast shear 4750.09 m/s, quasi-longitudinal 6544.61 m/s derived.

θ (deg)Rayleigh vfree (m/s)Rayleigh k²LSAW vfree (m/s)LSAW k²
03717.71.42%4642.321.05%
203662.90.61%4732.120.48%
403640.50.23%4749.415.95%
413640.50.22%4749.315.71%
603667.20.06%4711.711.32%
643679.00.03%4691.410.37%
703699.70.00%4653.49.00%
903785.60.43%4480.35.52%
1103891.72.42%4214.93.43%
1203949.84.15%4056.61.31% (indicative)
1283978.45.41%no isolated root–
1293977.55.42%no isolated root–
1503859.73.30%4305.312.79% (indicative)
1703756.62.00%4569.619.49%

Kushibiki et al. 1999 constants P, partial-wave solver, 0.5° sweep derived. Indicative: one of the two surfaces has no isolated leaky root (threshold-pinned), so k² uses a window-edge velocity.

The Rayleigh coupling peaks at 128 to 129°, where the leaky wave's coupling has fallen to 1.3% at 120° and no leaky root is resolved at 128 to 130°; the Rayleigh coupling falls to about zero near 60 to 70°, where the leaky wave carries 9 to 11%. One cut gives a clean Rayleigh filter, the other a clean, strongly coupled leaky-wave filter. Shibayama et al. 1976 reported an optimum rotated Y cut near 128° for SAW filters S.

A k² quoted for a cut is meaningful only with its constant set named: the older Warner set gives about 17% and 11% for 41 and 64°, the Kushibiki et al. 1999 and Ogi et al. 2002 sets 15.6 to 15.7% and 10.3 to 10.4% (switch the constant set in the figure). Cuts in use: LN 128° rotated Y wafers (350 µm at 4 in, 500 µm at 6 in) and LT 36 to 50° rotated Y wafers, mainly for smartphone SAW filters and duplexers (Sumitomo Metal Mining P). Thin-film LN uses X-cut and Z-cut films (and LN on sapphire) for phononic circuits; the in-plane propagation angle matters in addition to the cut (Sarabalis et al. 2020, abstract reported).

L3 Solver notes

thresholds, roots, conventions

Leaky branch. The leaky column needs the complex-velocity solver. Points marked “no isolated root” are where the leaky mode merges with the slow-shear threshold (4029 m/s along X) and the 4×4 boundary determinant has no isolated minimum. Near 36 to 41° the free-surface leaky root lies 0.7 to 0.8 m/s below the fast-shear threshold (4750.1 m/s for the Kushibiki et al. constants); after a minimum ends at the 1 m/s exclusion window, a search inside a 0.05 m/s window resolves it as an isolated complex root (41°: 4749.31 − 0.017i m/s, loss 2.0×10−4 dB per wavelength; metallized 4376.20 − 1.28i m/s, 0.016 dB per wavelength) derived. The same near-threshold position occurs for the Ogi et al. constants (4721.3 vs 4722.1) and the Warner et al. constants (4784.7 vs 4785.5). The vendor 4750 m/s for 41° equals this velocity to the stated digits V.

Spurious minima. The determinant has false minima at bulk thresholds; a 1 m/s window around each bulk velocity along x1 is excluded, a minimum that ends at a window edge is searched again inside a 0.05 m/s window, and only if no isolated zero exists there is it reported as threshold-pinned, never as a root.

Axes. Convention here: rotation matrix rows = new axes in crystal coordinates; cut = (YXl) θ; global x1 = propagation, x3 = outward plate normal.

Vendor values. Fomos-Materials lists 3980 m/s (128° Y-X), 4690 (64°) and 4750 (41°), within 3 m/s of the Kushibiki et al. 1999 results; its coupling percentages are for an undefined quantity and are not compared V.

References

3.4
SourceReferenceLink
IEEE 1988IEEE, IEEE (1988). IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity (IEEE Std 176-1987)doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.1988.79638
Kushibiki et al. 1999Kushibiki et al., IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 46 1315-1323 (1999). Accurate measurements of the acoustical physical constants of LiNbO3 and LiTaO3 single crystalsdoi:10.1109/58.796136
Ogi et al. 2002Ogi et al., Journal of Applied Physics 92 2451-2456 (2002). Acoustic spectroscopy of lithium niobate: Elastic and piezoelectric coefficientsdoi:10.1063/1.1497702
Warner et al. 1967Warner, Onoe & Coquin, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 42 1223-1231 (1967). Determination of Elastic and Piezoelectric Constants for Crystals in Class (3m)doi:10.1121/1.1910709
Weis & Gaylord 1985Weis & Gaylord, Applied Physics A Solids and Surfaces 37 191-203 (1985). Lithium niobate: Summary of physical properties and crystal structuredoi:10.1007/BF00614817
Campbell & Jones 1968Campbell & Jones, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics 15 209-217 (1968). A method for estimating optimal crystal cuts and propagation directions for excitation of piezoelectric surface wavesdoi:10.1109/T-SU.1968.29477
Ingebrigtsen 1969Ingebrigtsen, Journal of Applied Physics 40 2681-2686 (1969). Surface Waves in Piezoelectricsdoi:10.1063/1.1658060
Shibayama et al. 1976Shibayama et al., Proceedings of the IEEE 64 595-597 (1976). Optimum cut for rotated Y-cut LiNbO3 crystal used as the substrate of acoustic-surface-wave filtersdoi:10.1109/PROC.1976.10181
Sumitomo Metal MiningSumitomo Metal Mining. Lithium tantalate / lithium niobate single crystal substrateswww.smm.co.jp/en/business/material/products/lithium/
Sarabalis et al. 2020Sarabalis et al., APL Photonics 5 086104 (2020). Acousto-optic modulation in lithium niobate on sapphiredoi:10.1063/5.0012288
Fomos-MaterialsFomos-Materials. Lithium niobate (knowledge base)en.newpiezo.com/knowledge_base/1/lithium-niobate/