PPLN Λ = 6.82 µm · 1064 → 532 nm · 2 px/µm

3.3 Surface and guided waves

L1 Phenomenon

A sound wave can also cling to a surface, like a ripple on water, with its energy within about one wavelength of the top. On LN such a surface acoustic wave (SAW) travels at about 3.4 to 4.0 km/s, 75,000 to 88,000 times slower than light, so a 1 GHz signal becomes a ripple only 4 µm long that a pair of comb-shaped electrodes can launch and catch. Some crystal cuts carry a faster surface wave that leaks a little energy into the bulk as it travels; on the right cut that leak is tiny.

On 128° Y-X the surface atoms trace ellipses and the motion dies within about a wavelength; switch to 64° Y-X and the motion turns mostly horizontal shear, with a partial wave that carries energy down into the crystal.

SAW fields vs depth x3/λ, Kushibiki et al. 1999
Cut

u₁ along x₁

0−1λ−2λ−3λ

u₂ shear-horizontal

0−1λ−2λ−3λ

u₃ normal

0−1λ−2λ−3λ

φ potential

0−1λ−2λ−3λ

surface orbit (u₁ →, u₃ ↑)

       ·······       
    ···       ···    
   ··           ··   
  ·               ·  
  ·       +       ·  
  ·               ·  
   ··           ··   
    ···       ···    
       ···●···       
v
3978.4 m/s
λ
3.978 µm at 1 GHz
orbit
retrograde
E(<1 λ)
99.7 %
000°
Solid: magnitude; dashed: value at the phase shown (x₁ = 0). u normalized to max |u| = 1; φ normalized separately. E(<1 λ): share of ∫|u|²dx₃ within one wavelength (integrated to 3 λ).
partial-wave solution, Kushibiki et al. 1999 P derived frame IEEE-176-1987
surfaceshear-horizontal motion u₂ (out of the page), dot sizepotential φ > 0φ < 0displacement drawn ×0.07 λ at the peak

128° Y-X, Rayleigh, free surface

3978.4m/s
wavelength at 1 GHz
3.978 µm
surface orbit
retrograde
energy within 1 λ (of ∫|u|²dx₃ to 3 λ)
99.7 %
Cut
Surface
000°
partial-wave solution, Kushibiki et al. 1999 P derivedframe IEEE-176-1987u normalized to max |u| = 1, φ separatelysection along x₁ (propagation) and depth x₃, to scale in wavelengths

L2 Partial waves, coupling, standard cuts

Kushibiki et al. 1999; partial-wave solver

Rayleigh wave: traction-free surface wave on an elastic half-space, displacement in the sagittal plane, decaying with depth (Rayleigh 1885 S). On a piezoelectric substrate the partial waves also carry an electric potential that extends into the vacuum; the wave is slower when the surface is shorted by a thin metal film.

Partial-wave method (Campbell & Jones 1968 S): fields ∝ exp[ik(x1 + αx3 − vt)]; for each trial v the extended 4×4 Christoffel system in (u1, u2, u3, φ) gives an 8th-order polynomial in α; keep the 4 roots that decay into the substrate (or radiate away from the surface, for leaky waves); the SAW velocity is the root of the 4×4 boundary determinant (three traction components plus D3 continuity with the vacuum, or φ = 0 for a shorted surface) derived.

k2≈2vfree−vmetvfree(1)

Coupling as defined by Ingebrigtsen (Ingebrigtsen 1969 S). Leaky SAW (pseudo-SAW): a predominantly shear-horizontal surface wave faster than the slow shear bulk wave; it radiates into the bulk and its velocity is complex (Yamanouchi & Shibayama 1972 treat leaky surface waves in LN S).

Standard cuts, Kushibiki et al. 1999 constants

Cut (IEEE notation)Wavevfree (m/s)vmet (m/s)k² = 2Δv/vloss free / met (dB/λ)Vendor v (m/s)
Y-ZRayleigh3486.43412.74.23%– / –3488
(YXl) 128°, 128° Y-XRayleigh3978.43870.75.41%– / –3980
X-ZRayleigh3482.33405.94.39%– / ––
X-YRayleigh3696.43640.03.05%– / ––
Z-XRayleigh3785.63777.40.43%– / ––
(YXl) 64°leaky SAW4691.44448.210.37%0.0506 / 0.00334690
(YXl) 41°leaky SAW4749.34376.215.71%2.0×10⁻⁴ / 0.01604750
(YXl) 36°leaky SAW4749.44347.616.92%7.6×10⁻⁵ / 0.0331–

Computed with the partial-wave solver from the Kushibiki et al. 1999 constants P derived. Vendor column: Fomos-Materials knowledge base V; its coupling percentages (5.04, 5.7, 10, 17%) refer to an undefined quantity and are not compared. Losses of the leaky waves from the imaginary part of the complex root (first order).

The 36 to 41° free-surface leaky roots sit 0.7 to 0.8 m/s below the fast-shear bulk velocity along X (4750.1 m/s); they are isolated complex roots with very small radiation loss (41°: about 2×10−4 dB per wavelength free, 0.016 shorted), so the leaky wave on these cuts is almost a true surface wave until the surface is metallized.

Guided waves in thin films

Love-type and index-guided waves. A film whose shear velocity is lower than the substrate's guides acoustic waves without suspension; LN on sapphire uses this “phononic analogue of index guiding” (Mayor et al. 2021, abstract reported).

Plate modes in suspended films (Lamb and shear-horizontal): SH0, S0, A0 and thickness-shear overtones such as A1. A 400 nm ZY-LN platelet excited by lateral fields (XBAR) resonates near 4.8 GHz with coupling about 25% and Q about 300 (Plessky et al. 2019 reported). The bulk shear velocity along Z, 3590 m/s, over twice the thickness gives 3590/(2 × 400 nm) = 4.5 GHz (derived; ignores stiffening and electrode loading). Thin-film numbers are reported values plus this estimate; no plate-mode dispersion is computed.

Wavelength-scale mechanical waveguides (1 µm wide) on suspended TFLN and on LN on sapphire: 3.7.

L3 Constant-set sensitivity, root selection, definitions

three constant sets
Cut: vfree (m/s), k²Kushibiki et al. 1999Ogi et al. 2002 (ε^S Kushibiki)Warner et al. 1967 (ρ 4700 assumed)
Y-Z3486.4, 4.23%3485.2, 4.41%3489.8, 4.91%
128° Y-X3978.4, 5.41%3974.2, 5.41%3991.9, 5.27%
41° Y-X leaky4749.3, 15.71%4721.3, 15.57%4784.7, 16.99%
64° Y-X leaky4691.4, 10.37%4666.8, 10.31%4736.6, 11.03%

Kushibiki et al. 1999 P; Ogi et al. 2002 c, e, ρ 4636 P with the Kushibiki et al. εS (blended sensitivity case; Ogi et al. report no εS); Warner et al. 1967 c (Weis & Gaylord 1985 Table 6 P-comp), e (Ogi et al. 2002 Table III S), εS 44.3/27.9 (Weis & Gaylord 1985 Table 1), ρ 4700 kg/m³ assumed (the value Weis & Gaylord use in their AO figures). All computed derived.

The older Warner set gives about 17% and 11% for 41 and 64°; the Kushibiki et al. 1999 and Ogi et al. 2002 sets give 15.6 to 15.7% and 10.3 to 10.4%. A k² quoted for a cut is meaningful only with its constant set named.

Root selection. Below the limiting velocity (1/max s1 on the sagittal-plane slowness curves, which can lie below the slowest bulk velocity along x1 for rotated cuts) all 8 roots are complex; keep Im α < 0 (substrate at x3 < 0). For leaky waves keep the real roots whose time-averaged Poynting component points into the substrate, then continue the selection to complex velocity. Nondimensionalize (c by 1011 Pa, potential by √(c0/εref)) or the problem is ill-conditioned and the Y-Z root is lost in numerical noise.

Spurious minima. The determinant has false minima at bulk thresholds (e.g. 3590.4 m/s on Y-Z, 4750.1 m/s on X-propagating cuts); a 1 m/s window around each bulk velocity along x1 is excluded; a minimum that ends at a window edge is searched again inside a 0.05 m/s window, which resolves the 36 to 41° leaky roots 0.7 to 0.8 m/s below the fast-shear velocity.

k² definitions differ. 2Δv/v (Ingebrigtsen) vs electrode-admittance or effective-permittivity definitions; vendor sheets often do not state theirs.

Temperature coefficient of frequency. Vendor values −95 (Y-Z), −72 (128° Y-X), −70 (64 and 41° Y-X) ppm/K V. A computed TCF needs temperature coefficients of c, e, ε and thermal expansion as one consistent set; Smith and Welsh 1971 has c and s coefficients (Weis & Gaylord 1985 Tables 5-6 P-comp); the thermal expansion along c is 4.1 ppm/K in the Volk & Wöhlecke 2008 compilation (Table 1.1 P-comp). No computed TCF is shown.

References

3.3
SourceReferenceLink
Rayleigh 1885Rayleigh, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s1-17 4-11 (1885). On Waves Propagated along the Plane Surface of an Elastic Soliddoi:10.1112/plms/s1-17.1.4
Campbell & Jones 1968Campbell & Jones, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics 15 209-217 (1968). A method for estimating optimal crystal cuts and propagation directions for excitation of piezoelectric surface wavesdoi:10.1109/T-SU.1968.29477
Ingebrigtsen 1969Ingebrigtsen, Journal of Applied Physics 40 2681-2686 (1969). Surface Waves in Piezoelectricsdoi:10.1063/1.1658060
Yamanouchi & Shibayama 1972Yamanouchi & Shibayama, Journal of Applied Physics 43 856-862 (1972). Propagation and Amplification of Rayleigh Waves and Piezoelectric Leaky Surface Waves in LiNbO3doi:10.1063/1.1661294
Kushibiki et al. 1999Kushibiki et al., IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 46 1315-1323 (1999). Accurate measurements of the acoustical physical constants of LiNbO3 and LiTaO3 single crystalsdoi:10.1109/58.796136
Ogi et al. 2002Ogi et al., Journal of Applied Physics 92 2451-2456 (2002). Acoustic spectroscopy of lithium niobate: Elastic and piezoelectric coefficientsdoi:10.1063/1.1497702
Warner et al. 1967Warner, Onoe & Coquin, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 42 1223-1231 (1967). Determination of Elastic and Piezoelectric Constants for Crystals in Class (3m)doi:10.1121/1.1910709
Weis & Gaylord 1985Weis & Gaylord, Applied Physics A Solids and Surfaces 37 191-203 (1985). Lithium niobate: Summary of physical properties and crystal structuredoi:10.1007/BF00614817
Fomos-MaterialsFomos-Materials. Lithium niobate (knowledge base)en.newpiezo.com/knowledge_base/1/lithium-niobate/
Mayor et al. 2021Mayor et al., Physical Review Applied 15 014039 (2021). Gigahertz Phononic Integrated Circuits on Thin-Film Lithium Niobate on Sapphiredoi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.014039
Plessky et al. 2019Plessky et al., Electronics Letters 55 98-100 (2019). 5 GHz laterally-excited bulk-wave resonators (XBARs) based on thin platelets of lithium niobatedoi:10.1049/el.2018.7297
Smith & Welsh 1971Smith & Welsh, Journal of Applied Physics 42 2219-2230 (1971). Temperature Dependence of the Elastic, Piezoelectric, and Dielectric Constants of Lithium Tantalate and Lithium Niobatedoi:10.1063/1.1660528
Volk & Wohlecke 2009Volk & Wohlecke, Springer Series in Materials Science (2009). Lithium Niobate: Defects, Photorefraction and Ferroelectric Switchingdoi:10.1007/978-3-540-70766-0